A pet peeve of mine: many people do not realize that the email you are replying to is in the email header. (Specifically the “In-Reply-To” and “References” headers)
This feature makes it much easier to thread emails. It is easy for a mail client to tell that message X is in reply to message Y. It also has the side benefit that you can change the subject of a conversation without breaking the thread, if the subject of the conversation changes.
With that said, often people construct a new (non reply) email to a mailing list by
- Reply to an email sent to the list
- Clear the subject and contents of the email, and any recipients other than the list itself
- Set a new subject
- Write the email
When you do this, your email shows up as a reply to the original email! This is bad — your email might be missed as a reply to an older thread, and you leak information. It clutters up the thread information; neither you nor I want your email nested among the old thread. It makes it harder to read old threads. As such, I go through and manually fix the problem in my mailbox — which means that you’re making me do extra work!
The A correct way to send a new non-reply email to a list
- Create a new message (not a reply)
- Set the To: field to the mailing list address
- Set the subject to whatever
- Write the email
You can, of course, start with a reply and strip out the relevant headers, if your mail client lets you do that easily.
Note that the converse is also true — it is not correct to construct a reply by creating a new message and copying in the contents of the old one. However, the most common cause of missing reply headers is broken email clients rather than misinformed users.
Leave a Reply